The selection of treatment options becomes crucial when patients receive their skin cancer diagnosis. The treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers includes traditional methods like surgery and cryotherapy and radiation but Curaderm BEC5 topical therapy is becoming more popular. But how do they compare?
The standard treatments of Mohs surgery and excision provide effective results but patients usually experience scarring and discomfort together with recovery time. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy provide effective solutions for aggressive cases yet they produce systemic side effects and expensive treatment costs.
The topical non-invasive Curaderm BEC5 uses solasodine glycosides to specifically target cancerous cells. The treatment method preserves healthy tissue while patients can use it from home without needing hospital visits or time off work. Patients choose this method for treating lesions located on their face and neck and other body areas that require attention to appearance.
Pros of Curaderm BEC5
- The treatment method is non-surgical and simple to administer
- The substance originates from natural sources
- The treatment does not cause damage to healthy skin tissue
- The cost of surgical treatment is higher than Curaderm BEC5
- The treatment takes place in the comfort of your own home, under medical supervision
Cons of Curaderm BEC5
- The treatment needs patients to follow a prolonged multi-week application schedule
- The treatment caused typical side effects of inflammation and redness during its initial phase
- The treatment does not work for melanoma or cases of advanced cancer
The treatment of early-stage BCC and SCC presents Curaderm as a viable alternative option. Individuals who wish to use this treatment should consult with a qualified healthcare provider to have their lesions diagnosed and monitored in the first instance before starting with Curaderm BEC5.